Magnetic Behavior of Bi5Nb3-3xFe3xO15-δ Solid Solutions

N.A. Zhuk, N.V. Chezhina, V.A. Belyy, B.A. Makeev, L.V. Rychkova
show affiliations and emails
Received: 14 July 2017; Accepted: 05 October 2017
Citation: N.A. Zhuk, N.V. Chezhina, V.A. Belyy, B.A. Makeev, L.V. Rychkova. Magnetic Behavior of Bi5Nb3-3xFe3xO15-δ Solid Solutions. Letters on Materials, 2017, 7(4) 402-406
BibTex   DOI: 10.22226/2410-3535-2017-4-402-406

Abstract

The study of the iron-containing Bi5Nb3O15 solid solutions has shown that, in the solid solutions iron (III) atoms aggregate with antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic types of exchange.Most bismuth compounds with layered perovskite-like structure, analogs of Aurivillius phases, exhibit ferroelectric properties and are of interest from both practical and theoretical points of view. In this study, we carried out magnetochemical measurements of an electronic state and exchange interactions between iron atoms in the solid solutions Bi5Nb3O15, obtained by heterovalent substitution of niobium by atoms of iron (III). The iron-containing solid solutions were obtained in a narrow concentration range at x≤0.06. The iron-containing solid solutions at concentrations x> 0.005 are characterized by monoclinic distortion of the tetragonal cell (P2/m). The measurements of magnetic susceptibility of the solid solutions were carried out by the Faraday method in the temperature range of 77 - 400 K. The isotherms of a paramagnetic component of magnetic susceptibility of iron atoms are typical of antiferromagnets. The effective magnetic moment of single iron atoms increases with increasing temperature from 6.87 mB (90 K) to 6.92 mB (320 K). The study of the iron-containing Bi5Nb3O15 solid solutions has shown that, in the solid solutions iron (III) atoms aggregate to form dimers and tetramers with antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic types of exchange. The values of antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic exchange in dimers, Jdim = - 60 cm-1 and Jdim = 40 cm-1, and tetramers, Jtetr = - 40 cm-1 and Jtetr = 25 cm-1 correspondently.

References (18)

1.
G. A. Smolensky, V. A. Isupov, A. I. Agranovskaya, Sov. Phys. Sol. St., 3, 651 (1961). (in Russian) [Г. А. Смоленский, В. А. Исупов, А. И. Аграновская, Физика твердого тела, 3, 899 (1961).]
2.
G. A. Geguzina, A. T. Shuvaev, E. T. Shuvaeva, et al. Cristall. Rep. 50, 52 (2005). (in Russian) [Г. А. Гегузина, А. Т. Шуваев, Е. Т. Шуваева и др, Кристаллография, 50, 59 (2005).] DOI: 10.1134/1.1857245
3.
V. A. Isupov, Ferroelectrics, 189, 211 (1996). DOI: 10.1080/00150199608213420.
4.
R. Macquart, B. J. Kennedy, T. Kamiyama, F. Izumi, J. Phys.‑Condes. Matter. 16, 5443 (2004). DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/16/30/007.
5.
N. V. Chezhina, I. V. Piir, N. A. Zhuk, Rus. J. Gen. Chem., 84, 185 (2014). (in Russian) [Н. В. Чежина, И. В. Пийр, Н. А. Жук, ЖОХ, 2, 189 (2014).] DOI: 10.1134/S1070363214020030
6.
N. V. Chezhina, I. V. Piir, N. A. Zhuk, Rus. J. Gen. Chem., 75, 21 (2005). (in Russian) [Н. В. Чежина, И. В. Пийр, Н. А. Жук, ЖОХ, 75, 24 (2005).] DOI: 10.1007/s11176‑005‑0165‑6
7.
N. A. Zhuk, I. V. Piir, Inorgan. Mat., 44, 1362 (2008). (in Russian) [Н. А. Жук, И. В. Пийр, Неорг. матер., 44, 1504 (2008).] DOI: 10.1134/S0020168508120182
8.
G. A. Geguzina, A. T. Shuvaev, E. T. Shuvaeva, S. G. Gakh, Cristall. Rep. 48, 359 (2003). (in Russian) [Г. А. Гегузина, А. Т. Шуваев, Е. Т. Шуваева, С. Г. Гах, Кристаллохимия, 48, 403 (2003).] DOI: 10.1134/1.1578114
9.
J. Gopalakrishnan, A. Ramanan, C. N. R. Rao, D. A. Jefferson, D. J. Smith. J. Sol. St. Chem, 55,101 (1984). DOI: 10.1016/0022-4596(84)90252-4.
10.
T. Takenaka, K. Komura, K. Sakata, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 5080 (1996). DOI:10.1143/JJAP.35.5080
11.
N. A. Zhuk, I. V. Piir, N. V. Chezhina, Rus. J. Gen. Chem. 78, 376 (2008). (in Russian) [Н. А. Жук, И. В. Пийр, Н. В. Чежина, ЖОХ, 78, 393 (2008).] DOI: 10.1134/S1070363208030079
12.
N. A. Zhuk, I. V. Piir, A. L. Pimenov, N. V. Chezhina, Rus. J. Gen. Chem. 78, 335 (2008). (in Russian) [Н. А. Жук, И. В. Пийр, А. Л. Пименов, Н. В. Чежина, ЖОХ, 78, 353 (2008).] DOI: 10.1134/S1070363208030079
13.
N. A. Zhuk, I. V. Piir, A. L. Pimenov, N. V. Chezhina. Rus. J. Gen. Chem. 77, 990 (2007). (in Russian) [Н. А. Жук, И. В. Пийр, А. Л. Пименов, Н. В. Чежина, ЖОХ, 77, 898 (2007).] DOI: 10.1134/S1070363207060059
14.
L. G. Akselrud, Yu. N. Gryn, P. Yu. Zavalij, Thes. Rep. 12th Eur. Crystallogr. Meet. 155 (1985).
15.
V. K. Yanovskij, V. I. Voronkova, I. N. Leonteva, Inorgan. Mater. 26, 1154 (1990). (in Russian) [В. К. Яновский, В. И. Воронкова, И. В. Водолазская, Неорг. матер., 26, 1297 (1990).]
16.
V. K. Yanovskij, V. I. Voronkova, I. N. Leonteva, Inorgan. Mater. 25, 706 (1989). (in Russian) [В. К. Яновский, В. И. Воронкова, И. Н. Леонтьева, Неорг. матер., 25, 834 (1989).]
17.
Yu. V. Rakitin. Introduction to magnetochemistry. The method of static magnetic susceptibility in chemistry. Moscow: Science. 302 pp. (1980). (in Russian) [Ю. В. Ракитин, Введение в магнетохимию. Метод статической магнитной восприимчивости в химии. М: Наука. 302 С. (1980).]
18.
D. B. Goodenough, Magnetism and the Chemical Bond. Moscow: Metallurgy. 328 pp. (1968). (in Russian) [Д. Б. Гуденаф, Магнетизм и химическая связь. М: Металлургия. 328 С. (1968).]